spulugur
12-06 03:29 PM
Just signed up for $25 12month subscription - but cant access donor forum.
Transaction id 6EY322825M498640P.
User id: spulugur
Please provide access. to donor forum Thanks.
Transaction id 6EY322825M498640P.
User id: spulugur
Please provide access. to donor forum Thanks.
wallpaper Wallpapers of C / Johnny Bravo
sunny1000
07-04 05:03 PM
Here are the dates:
CIR 2007 introduced in Senate on: May 9, 2007
CIR Vote on cloture fails in Senate: June 7 2007
A related bill S. 1639 fails on: June 28, 2007
Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2007 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comprehensive_Immigration_Reform_Act_of_2007)
July 2007 visa bullettin released on :June 12 2007.
Bulletin was reversed on :July 2, 2007
S. 1639 failed on June 28, visa bulletin was reversed on July 2
July visa bulletin had already come out on June 12 2007.
The decision to publish this bulletin might have been taken sometime in May 2007.
Even if we base the events on the Original CIR 2007 which failed on June 7 2007, it would have taken sometime to communicate the decision to revert the bulletin to USCIS.
May be you are right or may be it is just a theory...who knows....the bottom line is that it does not matter who is at the helm (republican or democrat), nothing good has come to EB applicants since 2000 and it is going down hill. A lot of things have played a factor eg. 9/11/2001, 2001 recession, Bush's CIR idea in 2004 to give amesty to undocs which polarized both sides and we got caught in the cross fire, anti immigrants, racists (steve king, lou dobbs, tancredo, grassley and likes), protectionists (dick durbin, bernie sanders), no unity among EB applicants, 2008 recession and the list goes on.
CIR is such a lightning rod that even this administration (especially Rahm Emanuel) whose party has super majority in the senate, does not want to touch it. Any time we ask for a just a visa recapture, they say it will be a part of CIR which means that it is a dead-end deal. Now, to top all this, they are thowing more books at us to make us all illegal and find loop holes in the law to deport us. Man, I give up.
CIR 2007 introduced in Senate on: May 9, 2007
CIR Vote on cloture fails in Senate: June 7 2007
A related bill S. 1639 fails on: June 28, 2007
Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2007 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comprehensive_Immigration_Reform_Act_of_2007)
July 2007 visa bullettin released on :June 12 2007.
Bulletin was reversed on :July 2, 2007
S. 1639 failed on June 28, visa bulletin was reversed on July 2
July visa bulletin had already come out on June 12 2007.
The decision to publish this bulletin might have been taken sometime in May 2007.
Even if we base the events on the Original CIR 2007 which failed on June 7 2007, it would have taken sometime to communicate the decision to revert the bulletin to USCIS.
May be you are right or may be it is just a theory...who knows....the bottom line is that it does not matter who is at the helm (republican or democrat), nothing good has come to EB applicants since 2000 and it is going down hill. A lot of things have played a factor eg. 9/11/2001, 2001 recession, Bush's CIR idea in 2004 to give amesty to undocs which polarized both sides and we got caught in the cross fire, anti immigrants, racists (steve king, lou dobbs, tancredo, grassley and likes), protectionists (dick durbin, bernie sanders), no unity among EB applicants, 2008 recession and the list goes on.
CIR is such a lightning rod that even this administration (especially Rahm Emanuel) whose party has super majority in the senate, does not want to touch it. Any time we ask for a just a visa recapture, they say it will be a part of CIR which means that it is a dead-end deal. Now, to top all this, they are thowing more books at us to make us all illegal and find loop holes in the law to deport us. Man, I give up.
cool_desi_gc
11-09 09:46 PM
Went to Infopass
We had a real emergency. Mother in law getting operated and wife needs to go ASAP. They asked for a letter from the hospital stating about the surgery in hospital's letter head. They would not approve unless they see the letter. Nothing else i can do...trying to get the letter from India :(
We had a real emergency. Mother in law getting operated and wife needs to go ASAP. They asked for a letter from the hospital stating about the surgery in hospital's letter head. They would not approve unless they see the letter. Nothing else i can do...trying to get the letter from India :(
2011 picture johnny bravo
gccovet
07-28 04:18 PM
Please grant me Donor access:
Details :
Jul. 27, 2009 12:51:36 PDT
Transaction ID: 46X292526P6803626
Thank you
GCCovet
Details :
Jul. 27, 2009 12:51:36 PDT
Transaction ID: 46X292526P6803626
Thank you
GCCovet
more...
anilsal
09-07 12:09 PM
Also on Yahoo, members can ask questions to Sen.McCain. I am not able to find the link again.
RNGC
04-07 08:26 PM
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=18408
more...
kondur_007
07-22 01:51 PM
:confused:Hi ,
My PD is may 31st 2006,I-140 approved in august 2006
my 485 received date is july 2nd 2007
but when i check the status the automated voice is sayaing that they received the application on 31st july 2007. Can someone please clarify this.and what are my chances of approval in august.
Thankyou
I am sorry (in advance) if my response is annoying...
Well, your chances are pretty good (if your I 485 is in line and biometrics/fingerprinting etc is all done). However, eventually it depends on your "Grah dasha" and you should seriously consider doing "hom havan" and drive all the evil spirits out of your life. that would greatly improve your chances. If you are an Indian, you will understand what I said above; if not, it just means that it all depends on your LUCK...ARE YOU FEELING LUCKY??;)
BEST OF LUCK MY FRIEND...I AM JUST JOKING. HOPE YOU GET YOUR GC SOON.
My PD is may 31st 2006,I-140 approved in august 2006
my 485 received date is july 2nd 2007
but when i check the status the automated voice is sayaing that they received the application on 31st july 2007. Can someone please clarify this.and what are my chances of approval in august.
Thankyou
I am sorry (in advance) if my response is annoying...
Well, your chances are pretty good (if your I 485 is in line and biometrics/fingerprinting etc is all done). However, eventually it depends on your "Grah dasha" and you should seriously consider doing "hom havan" and drive all the evil spirits out of your life. that would greatly improve your chances. If you are an Indian, you will understand what I said above; if not, it just means that it all depends on your LUCK...ARE YOU FEELING LUCKY??;)
BEST OF LUCK MY FRIEND...I AM JUST JOKING. HOPE YOU GET YOUR GC SOON.
2010 Johnny Bravo
gc_mania_03
09-20 08:17 PM
Dear members,
Thank you for the outpouring of support. IV works for the interests of all of us, legal high-skilled immigrants, and we need to bolster its funding, as we will need to continue to spread awareness of our cause through the fall. We will not rest until our goals are acheived, and we in the core group will work hard through the fall.
Please keep up your support in IV and also help us recruit new members. We are working in the core group, not just here in Washington, DC such as myself, but all across the country, but in concert with each other.
Remember, we shall overcome and we shall win this just and legitimate struggle!
Courage!
Best,
RR (core member)
....another contribution from me $100...my third installment...
Keep it going IV!!
-gc_mania_03
Thank you for the outpouring of support. IV works for the interests of all of us, legal high-skilled immigrants, and we need to bolster its funding, as we will need to continue to spread awareness of our cause through the fall. We will not rest until our goals are acheived, and we in the core group will work hard through the fall.
Please keep up your support in IV and also help us recruit new members. We are working in the core group, not just here in Washington, DC such as myself, but all across the country, but in concert with each other.
Remember, we shall overcome and we shall win this just and legitimate struggle!
Courage!
Best,
RR (core member)
....another contribution from me $100...my third installment...
Keep it going IV!!
-gc_mania_03
more...
kumarc123
11-26 02:53 PM
I think we need better plan for fund requirement. How much is needed and where to be spent. This will give us better idea.
I agree with you on that, lets try to collect some money from the people who work and own BPO projects.
A lot if Indians are working in the IT sector, I believe we should get in touch with them
There are soo many IT companies in VA and DC, lets try to contact them, I am sure some Desi employers will work with us.
What do you all think?
I agree with you on that, lets try to collect some money from the people who work and own BPO projects.
A lot if Indians are working in the IT sector, I believe we should get in touch with them
There are soo many IT companies in VA and DC, lets try to contact them, I am sure some Desi employers will work with us.
What do you all think?
hair Johnny Bravo: Big Babe
njboy
09-25 04:19 PM
yes it has started. I've seen posts on this website from people who have had their 7th year rejected by california service center because they are subcontracting.
more...
chanduy9
07-06 02:09 PM
This thing has takena heavy toll on my fellow GC aspirants and brethren...I will pray for Our wel-flower.
Praying will not work...we are praying from past couple of years...join us..send the flowers...we need like you guys.
Thanks,
Chandra.
Praying will not work...we are praying from past couple of years...join us..send the flowers...we need like you guys.
Thanks,
Chandra.
hot Johnny Bravo 2
kc_p21
09-21 06:10 PM
Please allow access to the Donor Forum. I had contributed to FOIA request.
Thanks,
Date of sign up: Mar. 10, 2009
Subscription Name: Donation to Support Immigration Voice (User: Unregistered)
Subscription Number: S-8Y927958WM102800B
Thanks,
Date of sign up: Mar. 10, 2009
Subscription Name: Donation to Support Immigration Voice (User: Unregistered)
Subscription Number: S-8Y927958WM102800B
more...
house Johnny Bravo iPhone Wallpaper
qplearn
09-08 03:17 PM
Can we lobby for modified provisions of skil bill? As far as I know, some member of the house/senate has to present a bill with modified contents for it to be discussed. Our wish-lists (leave B but take out A) have no meaning.
Also, the bill as a whole has to make sense. It has to be tied to Skilled workers. You can't ignore the H-1B from skilled workers, although I do agree that if H1Bs keep coming at increased rates, the system will become even more clogged.
i know that and it should be stroked out from the SKIL bill
the only clause in the SKIL bill relating to immigration should be no numbers for people with advanced us degrees
Also, the bill as a whole has to make sense. It has to be tied to Skilled workers. You can't ignore the H-1B from skilled workers, although I do agree that if H1Bs keep coming at increased rates, the system will become even more clogged.
i know that and it should be stroked out from the SKIL bill
the only clause in the SKIL bill relating to immigration should be no numbers for people with advanced us degrees
tattoo Johnny Bravo 1
Macaca
01-05 11:37 AM
Rising Above "The Gathering Storm" (http://sciencecareers.sciencemag.org/career_development/previous_issues/articles/2007_12_14/caredit_a0700179) By Beryl Lieff Benderly | Science, 14 Dec 2007
In the past few years, reports by several prestigious bodies have warned that an impending shortage of scientists, engineers, and technical personnel at least partly caused by inadequate K-12 science education threatens the nation�s long-standing scientific leadership in an increasingly competitive, globalized world. With American prosperity dependent on innovation, the studies warn, the nation�s economic future is at risk.
The U.S. National Academies published the most influential of these documents, Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future (http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11463), to considerable fanfare in 2005. It called for more undergraduate and graduate science scholarships, new programs to train science teachers, more research funding, and more foreign scientists to be admitted to this country. Earlier this year, Congress enacted the first three recommendations in the America COMPETES Act (http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:SN00761:@@@D&summ2=m&).
Now, however, a new study and related congressional testimony call into question this picture of America�s educational system and scientific work force. Into the Eye of the Storm: Assessing the Evidence on Science and Engineering Education, Quality, and Workforce Demand (http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/411562_Salzman_Science.pdf), released in October by the Urban Institute (http://www.urban.org/) (UI), a policy-research organization in Washington, D.C., retains the U.S. National Academy of Sciences� report's meteorological metaphor but rejects its analysis and conclusions. "The education system produces qualified graduates far in excess of demand. � Workforce development and education policy requires a more thorough analysis than appears to be guiding current policy reports," Eye of the Storm states.
No disadvantage for the United States
"U.S. schools show steady improvement in math and science, the U.S. is not at any particular disadvantage compared to most nations, and the supply of S&E [science and engineering] graduates is large and ranks among the best internationally," continues Eye, which was co-authored by two labor force experts, B. Lindsay Lowell, director of Policy Studies for the Institute for the Study of International Migration at Georgetown University in Washington, D.C., and Harold Salzman of UI�s Center on Labor, Human Services, and Population.
Nor do today�s young Americans show less interest in science than previous generations, according to Eye of the Storm. "The proportion of all bachelor�s degrees awarded in S&E has been relatively stable over time, as has the proportion of freshmen in an S&E major," the report states. About three times as many Americans hold scientific degrees as work in scientific jobs. Science education does need improvement, Eye argues, but of a different form from that suggested in Gathering Storm.
Based on these findings, any shortage in America�s scientific labor market is "most likely a demand-side problem of STEM [science, technology, engineering, and mathematics] career opportunities that are less attractive than career opportunities in other fields" rather than a supply-side problem of too few Americans with scientific training, asserted Salzman in congressional testimony (http://science.house.gov/publications/hearings_markups_details.aspx?NewsID=2032) presented on 6 November before the House Committee on Science and Technology�s Subcommittee on Technology and Innovation. "The standard education measures indicate there are enough students with requisite skills to succeed in science and engineering courses of study, and managers we have interviewed rarely if ever note a lack of technical skills among their STEM workers," he continued.
On the contrary, Eye of the Storm states that "a weakening demand, a comparative decline in S&E wages, and market signals to students about low relative wages in S&E occupations" are discouraging able Americans from pursing scientific and technical careers. Rather than indicating a dearth of scientists, "research finds that the real wages in S&E occupations declined over the past two decades"--the opposite of what one would expect during a labor shortage.
Contrary to reported decline, both the number and the level of achievement of American high school science students have risen in recent decades, Eye continues. High schoolers on average now take a year more of both science and math than they did in the 1980s, and the number of students taking algebra by eighth grade has markedly increased. America�s apparently mediocre national averages on international tests reflect not uniformly poor performance, Eye argues, but rather the enormous diversity of our school population, which exceeds that of nearly every other competing country.
Close analysis of test results reveals that "the majority of U.S. students (white students) actually rank near the very top on international tests." Social and economic inequality, not just formal instruction, strongly affects test scores, and "achievement is known to vary significantly by socioeconomic class and race." Educational improvement efforts, Eye concludes, should focus not on correcting a nonexistent overall deficit but on improving the academic performance of the students "in the lower portion of the performance distribution," many of whom face social and familial challenges that interfere with their education.
"Largely inconsistent with the facts"
Gathering Storm�s image of mediocrity and shortage has become the "conventional portrait" of American scientific education and labor power that dominates media and political discussions, in the words of Michael Teitelbaum of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation in New York, New York, another witness at the 6 November hearing. That picture, however, is "largely inconsistent with the facts," he testified. Labor market data are "suggestive of surpluses" of scientists, with only "isolated shortages of skilled people in narrow fields or in specific technologies." In reality, "substantially more scientists and engineers graduate from U.S. universities than can find attractive career openings in the U.S. work force [and] the postdoc population, which has grown very rapidly in U.S. universities and is recruited increasingly from abroad, looks more like a pool of low-cost research lab workers with limited career prospects than a high-quality training program for soon-to-be academic researchers," he continued.
Eye of the Storm is hardly the first study to note such inconsistencies. "There are many researchers and organizations that have developed this set of understandings of what is actually happening--for example, leading researchers at the Rand Corporation, Harvard University, National Bureau of Economic Research, � Georgia State University, Stanford University," and others, Teitelbaum told the congressional committee. Even as major media figures such as New York Times columnist and megaselling "flat-world" guru Thomas Friedman were trumpeting Gathering Storm's conclusions, experts in labor-power economics and research administration were voicing less publicized doubts about any purported dearth of well-trained U.S. science graduates.
In 2005, for example--the same year that Gathering Storm was published--the National Academies also published Bridges to Independence: Fostering the Independence of New Investigators in Biomedical Research (http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11249), which received far less publicity. Produced by a committee of bioscience researchers chaired by Nobel laureate Thomas Cech, president of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute in Chevy Chase, Maryland, it bemoaned the damage done to the vitality of American science by the growing glut of young bioscience Ph.D.s.
Gathering Storm's argument is "influential because it is a point of view held and put forward strongly by very visible and reputable people and organizations," Teitelbaum tells Science Careers in an interview. The committee that produced Gathering Storm was chaired by Norman Augustine, retired chair and chief executive of Lockheed Martin Corp. and a member of numerous illustrious boards and advisory bodies, and included Nobel laureate Joshua Lederberg; executives of research-intensive corporations such as Intel, Eli Lilly, and DuPont; the director of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory; and presidents of Texas A&M, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Yale University, the University of Maryland, and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Gathering Storm's supporters "believe what they say, and they say it frequently and strongly and with conviction," Teitelbaum continues. "The people who say other than this are relatively less well-organized."
The existence of two conflicting narratives about America�s education and scientific labor market, each put forward by prominent and respected scientific figures, reveals a deep discontinuity in perceptions of what is going on in science. The discrepancy, some observers suggest, reveals less about the data points cited on the two sides of the debate than it does about the points of view of those doing the analysis.
In the past few years, reports by several prestigious bodies have warned that an impending shortage of scientists, engineers, and technical personnel at least partly caused by inadequate K-12 science education threatens the nation�s long-standing scientific leadership in an increasingly competitive, globalized world. With American prosperity dependent on innovation, the studies warn, the nation�s economic future is at risk.
The U.S. National Academies published the most influential of these documents, Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future (http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11463), to considerable fanfare in 2005. It called for more undergraduate and graduate science scholarships, new programs to train science teachers, more research funding, and more foreign scientists to be admitted to this country. Earlier this year, Congress enacted the first three recommendations in the America COMPETES Act (http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:SN00761:@@@D&summ2=m&).
Now, however, a new study and related congressional testimony call into question this picture of America�s educational system and scientific work force. Into the Eye of the Storm: Assessing the Evidence on Science and Engineering Education, Quality, and Workforce Demand (http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/411562_Salzman_Science.pdf), released in October by the Urban Institute (http://www.urban.org/) (UI), a policy-research organization in Washington, D.C., retains the U.S. National Academy of Sciences� report's meteorological metaphor but rejects its analysis and conclusions. "The education system produces qualified graduates far in excess of demand. � Workforce development and education policy requires a more thorough analysis than appears to be guiding current policy reports," Eye of the Storm states.
No disadvantage for the United States
"U.S. schools show steady improvement in math and science, the U.S. is not at any particular disadvantage compared to most nations, and the supply of S&E [science and engineering] graduates is large and ranks among the best internationally," continues Eye, which was co-authored by two labor force experts, B. Lindsay Lowell, director of Policy Studies for the Institute for the Study of International Migration at Georgetown University in Washington, D.C., and Harold Salzman of UI�s Center on Labor, Human Services, and Population.
Nor do today�s young Americans show less interest in science than previous generations, according to Eye of the Storm. "The proportion of all bachelor�s degrees awarded in S&E has been relatively stable over time, as has the proportion of freshmen in an S&E major," the report states. About three times as many Americans hold scientific degrees as work in scientific jobs. Science education does need improvement, Eye argues, but of a different form from that suggested in Gathering Storm.
Based on these findings, any shortage in America�s scientific labor market is "most likely a demand-side problem of STEM [science, technology, engineering, and mathematics] career opportunities that are less attractive than career opportunities in other fields" rather than a supply-side problem of too few Americans with scientific training, asserted Salzman in congressional testimony (http://science.house.gov/publications/hearings_markups_details.aspx?NewsID=2032) presented on 6 November before the House Committee on Science and Technology�s Subcommittee on Technology and Innovation. "The standard education measures indicate there are enough students with requisite skills to succeed in science and engineering courses of study, and managers we have interviewed rarely if ever note a lack of technical skills among their STEM workers," he continued.
On the contrary, Eye of the Storm states that "a weakening demand, a comparative decline in S&E wages, and market signals to students about low relative wages in S&E occupations" are discouraging able Americans from pursing scientific and technical careers. Rather than indicating a dearth of scientists, "research finds that the real wages in S&E occupations declined over the past two decades"--the opposite of what one would expect during a labor shortage.
Contrary to reported decline, both the number and the level of achievement of American high school science students have risen in recent decades, Eye continues. High schoolers on average now take a year more of both science and math than they did in the 1980s, and the number of students taking algebra by eighth grade has markedly increased. America�s apparently mediocre national averages on international tests reflect not uniformly poor performance, Eye argues, but rather the enormous diversity of our school population, which exceeds that of nearly every other competing country.
Close analysis of test results reveals that "the majority of U.S. students (white students) actually rank near the very top on international tests." Social and economic inequality, not just formal instruction, strongly affects test scores, and "achievement is known to vary significantly by socioeconomic class and race." Educational improvement efforts, Eye concludes, should focus not on correcting a nonexistent overall deficit but on improving the academic performance of the students "in the lower portion of the performance distribution," many of whom face social and familial challenges that interfere with their education.
"Largely inconsistent with the facts"
Gathering Storm�s image of mediocrity and shortage has become the "conventional portrait" of American scientific education and labor power that dominates media and political discussions, in the words of Michael Teitelbaum of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation in New York, New York, another witness at the 6 November hearing. That picture, however, is "largely inconsistent with the facts," he testified. Labor market data are "suggestive of surpluses" of scientists, with only "isolated shortages of skilled people in narrow fields or in specific technologies." In reality, "substantially more scientists and engineers graduate from U.S. universities than can find attractive career openings in the U.S. work force [and] the postdoc population, which has grown very rapidly in U.S. universities and is recruited increasingly from abroad, looks more like a pool of low-cost research lab workers with limited career prospects than a high-quality training program for soon-to-be academic researchers," he continued.
Eye of the Storm is hardly the first study to note such inconsistencies. "There are many researchers and organizations that have developed this set of understandings of what is actually happening--for example, leading researchers at the Rand Corporation, Harvard University, National Bureau of Economic Research, � Georgia State University, Stanford University," and others, Teitelbaum told the congressional committee. Even as major media figures such as New York Times columnist and megaselling "flat-world" guru Thomas Friedman were trumpeting Gathering Storm's conclusions, experts in labor-power economics and research administration were voicing less publicized doubts about any purported dearth of well-trained U.S. science graduates.
In 2005, for example--the same year that Gathering Storm was published--the National Academies also published Bridges to Independence: Fostering the Independence of New Investigators in Biomedical Research (http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11249), which received far less publicity. Produced by a committee of bioscience researchers chaired by Nobel laureate Thomas Cech, president of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute in Chevy Chase, Maryland, it bemoaned the damage done to the vitality of American science by the growing glut of young bioscience Ph.D.s.
Gathering Storm's argument is "influential because it is a point of view held and put forward strongly by very visible and reputable people and organizations," Teitelbaum tells Science Careers in an interview. The committee that produced Gathering Storm was chaired by Norman Augustine, retired chair and chief executive of Lockheed Martin Corp. and a member of numerous illustrious boards and advisory bodies, and included Nobel laureate Joshua Lederberg; executives of research-intensive corporations such as Intel, Eli Lilly, and DuPont; the director of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory; and presidents of Texas A&M, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Yale University, the University of Maryland, and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Gathering Storm's supporters "believe what they say, and they say it frequently and strongly and with conviction," Teitelbaum continues. "The people who say other than this are relatively less well-organized."
The existence of two conflicting narratives about America�s education and scientific labor market, each put forward by prominent and respected scientific figures, reveals a deep discontinuity in perceptions of what is going on in science. The discrepancy, some observers suggest, reveals less about the data points cited on the two sides of the debate than it does about the points of view of those doing the analysis.
more...
pictures Johnny Bravo 3
arunmohan
06-13 06:45 PM
hello,My congratulations to all the immigration voice members who are atlast ready to file I 485 on july first.
Its unbelievable that USCIS makes the dates current inspite of predictions.
I think they got some" internal orders "from White house to get rid of backlog so they can make rooms for their dear ILLEGALS.Any way for me and i believe for ALL others Its like a first showers of monsoon.
I would like to thank core members for doing an excellent job for us.In future i see logiclife ,waldenpond and our dear pappu as our new political leaders in this foreign land."count me in" whenever you need me.
Its unbelievable that USCIS makes the dates current inspite of predictions.
I think they got some" internal orders "from White house to get rid of backlog so they can make rooms for their dear ILLEGALS.Any way for me and i believe for ALL others Its like a first showers of monsoon.
I would like to thank core members for doing an excellent job for us.In future i see logiclife ,waldenpond and our dear pappu as our new political leaders in this foreign land."count me in" whenever you need me.
dresses Come after the jonny bravo the
mgmanoj
09-05 10:12 PM
Landed in January 2000
1st Labor September 2001 - company got sold
2nd Labor January 2004 - 140 denied due to 3 year degree attorneys mistake
3rd Labor June 2007 (EB3) -
140 approved in May 2008 - waiting to file 485
1st Labor September 2001 - company got sold
2nd Labor January 2004 - 140 denied due to 3 year degree attorneys mistake
3rd Labor June 2007 (EB3) -
140 approved in May 2008 - waiting to file 485
more...
makeup people Johnny bravo,
jambapamba
07-18 07:50 AM
Excellent point.
......
I would suggest keep faith & wish you all the best & pray that your labor approval from DBEC comes through at the earliest enabling you to file in the next 2- 3 weeks itself - be prepared with the other documents for 485 so that you are not caught by surprise when the labor approval happens.
What stage is your labor at DBEC...?
......
I would suggest keep faith & wish you all the best & pray that your labor approval from DBEC comes through at the earliest enabling you to file in the next 2- 3 weeks itself - be prepared with the other documents for 485 so that you are not caught by surprise when the labor approval happens.
What stage is your labor at DBEC...?
girlfriend Johnny Bravo, Dexter,
ivjobs
03-07 11:27 AM
This funny business of turning away non-immigrant workers at airports/consulates must be tackled head on by IV. This is outrageous behavior on the part of immigration officials. If a person has valid visa then it automatically implies that all the concerns of DOL have been addressed. Immigration officials have no business poking there nose in it.
We must draw a line here. Let's tell CIS is that we can not take the crap any further. Such kind of behavior on their part plays havoc with temporary workers life. Just imagine what happens when a family is split in half due to the denial of reentry.
Yes, something has to be done from IV to tackle such kind if issues..
We must draw a line here. Let's tell CIS is that we can not take the crap any further. Such kind of behavior on their part plays havoc with temporary workers life. Just imagine what happens when a family is split in half due to the denial of reentry.
Yes, something has to be done from IV to tackle such kind if issues..
hairstyles johnny bravo irl Image
greencardfever
06-16 03:15 PM
I don't have copies of the old I-94's, will the F1 visa on my passport or transcripts from the university be enough?
maverick_joe
02-13 03:48 PM
you do not pay it back but when you file your taxes for the year 2008..which would be in 2009 they would deduct the amount you get as a rebate thru the stimulus package!!
"Do I have to pay the rebate back?
No. And here's why.
Your rebate is a one-time tax cut - an advance on a credit you'll receive on your 2008 return.
It's based on your 2007 income initially. If it turns out that your 2008 income and number of children would have qualified you for a larger rebate than the one you received, you'll be sent the difference. If it turns out your 2008 income was lower than in 2007 and you should have gotten a lower rebate, you get to keep the difference.
"If you were supposed to receive a larger payment than you did, you will get the extra money," said Treasury spokesman Andrew DeSouza. "If you received more than what you should have gotten, you will not be penalized."
link here (http://money.cnn.com/2008/02/08/pf/taxes/rebates_what_you_need_to_know/)
"Do I have to pay the rebate back?
No. And here's why.
Your rebate is a one-time tax cut - an advance on a credit you'll receive on your 2008 return.
It's based on your 2007 income initially. If it turns out that your 2008 income and number of children would have qualified you for a larger rebate than the one you received, you'll be sent the difference. If it turns out your 2008 income was lower than in 2007 and you should have gotten a lower rebate, you get to keep the difference.
"If you were supposed to receive a larger payment than you did, you will get the extra money," said Treasury spokesman Andrew DeSouza. "If you received more than what you should have gotten, you will not be penalized."
link here (http://money.cnn.com/2008/02/08/pf/taxes/rebates_what_you_need_to_know/)
andymajumder
11-09 07:25 PM
Sent on 10/16
Sent documents on 10/18.
Receipt notice on 10/21 (Last LUD)
Ever since the status has been "Initial Review".
Took an Infopass Appt on 11/9 to see whats going on.
Urgently need to go to India for an emergency :(
Any luck yet, how did the Infopass Appt go? Is there a way to get the AP from local office, if the AP doesn't come on time? Please share your experiences.....
Sent documents on 10/18.
Receipt notice on 10/21 (Last LUD)
Ever since the status has been "Initial Review".
Took an Infopass Appt on 11/9 to see whats going on.
Urgently need to go to India for an emergency :(
Any luck yet, how did the Infopass Appt go? Is there a way to get the AP from local office, if the AP doesn't come on time? Please share your experiences.....
No comments:
Post a Comment