lvinaykumar
07-13 03:20 AM
are you guys still waiting for this
wallpaper Brook Shields
somegchuh
12-14 12:39 PM
I would strongly urge everyone to file for canadian PR without any agency/lawyer. Just visit cic.gc.ca
Fill in the form and send them asap. They will keep coming back if they need more docs. Don't rush for FBI report [fingerprints] as they are valid only for 6 months. They will ask for it after everything else is in order.
Your total expense per person starting from start to finish ....about $ 2000
It includes initial fees, medical exams, landing fees etc.
Your total time could range from 1.5 years to 2.5 years depending on the case.
Hope this helps.
Fill in the form and send them asap. They will keep coming back if they need more docs. Don't rush for FBI report [fingerprints] as they are valid only for 6 months. They will ask for it after everything else is in order.
Your total expense per person starting from start to finish ....about $ 2000
It includes initial fees, medical exams, landing fees etc.
Your total time could range from 1.5 years to 2.5 years depending on the case.
Hope this helps.
CanadianGuy
05-17 02:05 PM
Sweet work there DJ! The colours and textures are perfect.
2011 calvin klein
designserve
01-27 02:42 PM
Testing to see if this appears.Go to this page :
Committee on Judiciary Subcommittee Jurisdiction (http://judiciary.house.gov/about/subcommittee.html)
Committee on Judiciary Subcommittee Jurisdiction (http://judiciary.house.gov/about/subcommittee.html)
more...
thomachan72
06-22 10:15 AM
Copsmart/Frostrated/anilkumar0902/Uma001/desitechie/Optimist/Other Guru's,
Thanks in advance for any suggestions you can provide
Here is the current status:
- Consulted my lawyer and went thru all docs they submitted as part of my I140 package. On my last employer experience, found out that I had submitted only one affidavit from a co-worker and that would cover for less than 60 months of experience at my last my place.
- Came up with a list of some 30+ documents that include paystubs from US/India, W2/Form16's, letters submitted to CIS by previous company for new H1b back in 2003 and then for an extn in 2006, appreciation letters and other material on previous company letterhead. Discussed this with my lawyer
- Lawyer is of the opinion that we can prove our case of alternate evidence based on documents i am producing.
- Plan is to submit an affidavit from me that i was unable to get an exp. letter from my previous employer mentioning reasons on why its not possible, submit 2 affidavits from ex co-workers covering span of 63 months.
Based on your scenario or known people, can one of you respond to how should i approach following issues:
1) I am going to draft content for experience letter non-availability. I have mail trail from last 1 year following up on asking for details of $12K. Same mail mentions that am asking for experience letter and provident fund amount back from HR. Will it be a good idea to attach deputation letter mentioning 5 lac indian rupee to be paid for breach of terms and a 100 rupee bond paper contents which i signed before US deputation. Will it be Ok to mention that previous employer is asking for $12K settlement amount to provide experience letter and attach copies of bond and deputation note OR only mention that am unable to get experience letter and i have been following up with HR for last 1 year and attach email trail as evidence. Any pros and cons from CIS perspective on which approach to choose.
2) Any other documentation that needs to be submitted ? Supporting evidence alongwith company lawyer detailed letter, 2 affidavits from co-workers for skills and duration, self affidavit for experience letter not available will be -
> Paystubs from US/India, not for all 63 months but for some months in 2004/6/7/8.
> W2's for 2005/6/8.
> Form 16 for 2005-6/2007-8
> Offer letter, yearly appraisal letters, US deputation letters, appreciation letters, ID Cards, 3 Business cards showing change in designations.
I would highly value the following since you already have them; Offer letter (hopefully having some of your duties and benefits indicated), yearly appraisal letters (for all 5 years if possible), copy of the Indian income tax forms, appreciation letters + affidavit from couple of your colleagues.
The idea is to have atleast a few solid evidences and then add in the rest but dont clutter the whole thing in a way that they miss the most important ones.
List the evidence on a seperate paper in the order of importance and then arrange the actual evidence or notarized copies in that order.
It will work out so dont worry.
Thanks in advance for any suggestions you can provide
Here is the current status:
- Consulted my lawyer and went thru all docs they submitted as part of my I140 package. On my last employer experience, found out that I had submitted only one affidavit from a co-worker and that would cover for less than 60 months of experience at my last my place.
- Came up with a list of some 30+ documents that include paystubs from US/India, W2/Form16's, letters submitted to CIS by previous company for new H1b back in 2003 and then for an extn in 2006, appreciation letters and other material on previous company letterhead. Discussed this with my lawyer
- Lawyer is of the opinion that we can prove our case of alternate evidence based on documents i am producing.
- Plan is to submit an affidavit from me that i was unable to get an exp. letter from my previous employer mentioning reasons on why its not possible, submit 2 affidavits from ex co-workers covering span of 63 months.
Based on your scenario or known people, can one of you respond to how should i approach following issues:
1) I am going to draft content for experience letter non-availability. I have mail trail from last 1 year following up on asking for details of $12K. Same mail mentions that am asking for experience letter and provident fund amount back from HR. Will it be a good idea to attach deputation letter mentioning 5 lac indian rupee to be paid for breach of terms and a 100 rupee bond paper contents which i signed before US deputation. Will it be Ok to mention that previous employer is asking for $12K settlement amount to provide experience letter and attach copies of bond and deputation note OR only mention that am unable to get experience letter and i have been following up with HR for last 1 year and attach email trail as evidence. Any pros and cons from CIS perspective on which approach to choose.
2) Any other documentation that needs to be submitted ? Supporting evidence alongwith company lawyer detailed letter, 2 affidavits from co-workers for skills and duration, self affidavit for experience letter not available will be -
> Paystubs from US/India, not for all 63 months but for some months in 2004/6/7/8.
> W2's for 2005/6/8.
> Form 16 for 2005-6/2007-8
> Offer letter, yearly appraisal letters, US deputation letters, appreciation letters, ID Cards, 3 Business cards showing change in designations.
I would highly value the following since you already have them; Offer letter (hopefully having some of your duties and benefits indicated), yearly appraisal letters (for all 5 years if possible), copy of the Indian income tax forms, appreciation letters + affidavit from couple of your colleagues.
The idea is to have atleast a few solid evidences and then add in the rest but dont clutter the whole thing in a way that they miss the most important ones.
List the evidence on a seperate paper in the order of importance and then arrange the actual evidence or notarized copies in that order.
It will work out so dont worry.
waitingmygc
11-30 05:37 AM
Hi EkAurAaya,
Congratulations!!!
Please share more info on what steps you undertook to utilize your sopouse EB-2 PD from your already filled 485 as EB-3 primary.
It will help others too.
Congratulations!!!
Please share more info on what steps you undertook to utilize your sopouse EB-2 PD from your already filled 485 as EB-3 primary.
It will help others too.
more...
kams
06-15 01:15 PM
At Dr.Marcel Stern, I got an appointment for June 29th. For kids, the charge is $100, for adults b/w 280-350.
They specifically mentioned that they are no longer entertaining Walk in any more. They used to till 12:00 noon today.
All doctors are swamped.
They specifically mentioned that they are no longer entertaining Walk in any more. They used to till 12:00 noon today.
All doctors are swamped.
2010 Schaffer at Calvin Klein.
rk07
09-20 10:16 PM
Hi,
Are there any one who filed at NSC on July 23rd and not received the receipt so far?
Thanks,
-rk.
Are there any one who filed at NSC on July 23rd and not received the receipt so far?
Thanks,
-rk.
more...
addsf345
11-12 02:28 PM
Please post any link where it says it is stricter or any new stuff USCIS wants to implement
Chandu, here I found the LINK (http://www.murthy.com/news/n_porret.html)
"When explaining the risk of potentially stricter AC21 regulations to I-485 applicants, we are frequently asked, "If I change jobs under AC21 and the regulations are released after that, they won't apply to me, right?" Unfortunately, this is not correct. While it is not possible to predict the content or effective date of any future regulations, they will likely apply at the time of adjudicating the I-485 application, and not just when the job change occurs. In a hypothetical example, if new regulations were to limit the percentage of acceptable salary difference, or prevent multiple portings, the officer adjudicating the I-485 could decide that the job change violates the regulations, even if the change occurred months or years before the new regulations were issued."
Chandu, here I found the LINK (http://www.murthy.com/news/n_porret.html)
"When explaining the risk of potentially stricter AC21 regulations to I-485 applicants, we are frequently asked, "If I change jobs under AC21 and the regulations are released after that, they won't apply to me, right?" Unfortunately, this is not correct. While it is not possible to predict the content or effective date of any future regulations, they will likely apply at the time of adjudicating the I-485 application, and not just when the job change occurs. In a hypothetical example, if new regulations were to limit the percentage of acceptable salary difference, or prevent multiple portings, the officer adjudicating the I-485 could decide that the job change violates the regulations, even if the change occurred months or years before the new regulations were issued."
hair Brooke Shields
sunny1000
11-12 03:25 PM
Did you have to get it in advance or did you get it on arrival?
I got this in advance. But, it does not apply to you as you have a GC and you don't need a Mexican visa.
I got this in advance. But, it does not apply to you as you have a GC and you don't need a Mexican visa.
more...
punjabi
03-18 12:11 AM
Hi poorslumdogs,
If you refer to some thread, please do not ask others to search for it. Instead paste its link in your post so others can read it.
I heard from my friends there are no legal implications if you get laid off on EAD and you also have a valid parolee document.
This should get verified from an attorney though, specially if others create a doubt.
[QUOTE=.....That thread was created in the last 2-3 months time. So search for it.
There is definitely some legal implication otherwise why your employer wants to inform USCIS. They wanted to be in the safer side. So if anything happens you are the one going to face the music. So check with some good attorney.[/QUOTE]
If you refer to some thread, please do not ask others to search for it. Instead paste its link in your post so others can read it.
I heard from my friends there are no legal implications if you get laid off on EAD and you also have a valid parolee document.
This should get verified from an attorney though, specially if others create a doubt.
[QUOTE=.....That thread was created in the last 2-3 months time. So search for it.
There is definitely some legal implication otherwise why your employer wants to inform USCIS. They wanted to be in the safer side. So if anything happens you are the one going to face the music. So check with some good attorney.[/QUOTE]
hot Shields streetcar
greencardfever
02-17 12:43 PM
Hi,
I'm a bachelor and applied for 485 in July '07. I got my EAD, AP, FP etc. I'm using my H1B visa to work (not my EAD).
I'm currently working for Company X that filed by 485. If I do an H1B transfer and work full time for my client, Company Y, then after getting married and my priority date becoming current, who has to file my spouse's 485 - Company X, Company Y or can I go to any independent lawyer that is not working for Company X or Y?
Is the 485 application linked to the company that filed my labor and 140?
Please let me know.
Thanks,
greencardfever
I'm a bachelor and applied for 485 in July '07. I got my EAD, AP, FP etc. I'm using my H1B visa to work (not my EAD).
I'm currently working for Company X that filed by 485. If I do an H1B transfer and work full time for my client, Company Y, then after getting married and my priority date becoming current, who has to file my spouse's 485 - Company X, Company Y or can I go to any independent lawyer that is not working for Company X or Y?
Is the 485 application linked to the company that filed my labor and 140?
Please let me know.
Thanks,
greencardfever
more...
house Brooke Shields | La Petite en
chanduv23
11-19 11:36 AM
I must say Ron Rocks! See his post on his forums thread....
http://immigration-information.com/forums/showpost.php?p=24864&postcount=8
Hope this will help you to understand this issue further.
Hmmm - unless the IO has details about the new employer - how can the IO judge if the new employer is a profit or no profit or big or small.
AC21 means - only same or similar job, I don't think employer will make a difference, though wage maybe a big factor
http://immigration-information.com/forums/showpost.php?p=24864&postcount=8
Hope this will help you to understand this issue further.
Hmmm - unless the IO has details about the new employer - how can the IO judge if the new employer is a profit or no profit or big or small.
AC21 means - only same or similar job, I don't think employer will make a difference, though wage maybe a big factor
tattoo calvin klein ad rooke
seeniraj
03-31 12:30 PM
Thanks
more...
pictures Brooke Shields, Calvin Klein
Pagal
03-23 02:40 PM
Hello Sleuths,
:) I appreciate your logical thinking and attention to detail! Yes, I've a worldwide roaming cell phone whose number is listed in Bay area, but I can receive calls wherever cellphone signal reaches.
I had included my cell phone number in my letters to IO earlier and he first called my office number and then tried my cell.
:) I appreciate your logical thinking and attention to detail! Yes, I've a worldwide roaming cell phone whose number is listed in Bay area, but I can receive calls wherever cellphone signal reaches.
I had included my cell phone number in my letters to IO earlier and he first called my office number and then tried my cell.
dresses Is that Brooke Shields under
PD_Dec2002
03-20 08:19 AM
Typical response just to defend......green card might be least of my priorities....but may be its your only priority for you !!!!!
You still haven't shown me the text from any of the three bills that says Masters in STEM are exempt from the EB cap. After all, that's the only thing that will prove you or me wrong.
Regards,
Jayant
You still haven't shown me the text from any of the three bills that says Masters in STEM are exempt from the EB cap. After all, that's the only thing that will prove you or me wrong.
Regards,
Jayant
more...
makeup Sidewalks TV: Brooke Shields
andy garcia
08-29 02:33 PM
This is the list of Witnesses(Panelists):
Panel I
David Daniel, Ph.D. , President UT at Dallas
Richardson, TX
Bo Cooper
Former General Counsel INS on behalf of Global Personnel Alliance
Washington, DC
Panel II
Philip J. Ritter
Senior VP and Manager of Public Affairs
Texas Instruments, Inc., Dallas, TX
Phyllis Norman, VP
Patient Care Services
Harris Methodist Ft. Worth Hospital
Ft. Worth, TX
Lance Kaplan
Partner
Fragomen, Del Rey, Bernsen, Loewy, LLP
on behalf of the American Council on International Personnel
Iselin, NJ
We should contact anybody who works in these companies.
Panel I
David Daniel, Ph.D. , President UT at Dallas
Richardson, TX
Bo Cooper
Former General Counsel INS on behalf of Global Personnel Alliance
Washington, DC
Panel II
Philip J. Ritter
Senior VP and Manager of Public Affairs
Texas Instruments, Inc., Dallas, TX
Phyllis Norman, VP
Patient Care Services
Harris Methodist Ft. Worth Hospital
Ft. Worth, TX
Lance Kaplan
Partner
Fragomen, Del Rey, Bernsen, Loewy, LLP
on behalf of the American Council on International Personnel
Iselin, NJ
We should contact anybody who works in these companies.
girlfriend Kim Kardashian Calvin Kleins
stevestamps
07-13 06:21 PM
Latest update on http://www.immigration-law.com/
07/13/2007: Agonizying Moments for DHS/USCIS Leaders
There is no doubt that people from time to time go through a tense and agonizying moment while the noise of clock ticking is getting louder and lauder. Reportedly, that is what the leaders of the agencies have been going through to abate things going out of control politically. Rep. Zoe Lofgren is a powerful chairwomea of the Judiciary Committee Immigration Subcommitee of the House of Representatives. Day before yesterday, she served a request for information, record, documents, and evidence in the tone of a discovery in the court proceeding. The letter resembled the combination of request for admission and demand for records in the federal court proceeding. The Secretary of Homeland Security was given only three days to meet the demand. Apparently, the leaders of the DHS and USCIS have been struggling to work out some kind of solutions and thereby prevent thing going out of control as the records, emails, documents, etc. etc. can turn out to be very smelly and juicy depending on which side of the party politics one is involved. Under the circumstances, the leaders have been talking about various options with the departments and pending the discussions, everything has been on hold including the visa bulletin release schedules.
Yesterday, we described potential four options for the DOS and the USCIS. Unconfirmed sources indicate that the last option appears to be "out." Obviously there are still under a tremendous pressure to work out a solution before the three-day deadline of the Congresswoman's investigatory demand. It is going to be a very tense and stressful weekend for these officials. For that matter, the immigrants may also go through a similar process emotionally during the weekend, not knowing when and what information will be released during the weekend or Monday. Eyes of the many immigrants will be glued to the computer monitors. May God Help the Poor Souls! Amen.
07/13/2007: Agonizying Moments for DHS/USCIS Leaders
There is no doubt that people from time to time go through a tense and agonizying moment while the noise of clock ticking is getting louder and lauder. Reportedly, that is what the leaders of the agencies have been going through to abate things going out of control politically. Rep. Zoe Lofgren is a powerful chairwomea of the Judiciary Committee Immigration Subcommitee of the House of Representatives. Day before yesterday, she served a request for information, record, documents, and evidence in the tone of a discovery in the court proceeding. The letter resembled the combination of request for admission and demand for records in the federal court proceeding. The Secretary of Homeland Security was given only three days to meet the demand. Apparently, the leaders of the DHS and USCIS have been struggling to work out some kind of solutions and thereby prevent thing going out of control as the records, emails, documents, etc. etc. can turn out to be very smelly and juicy depending on which side of the party politics one is involved. Under the circumstances, the leaders have been talking about various options with the departments and pending the discussions, everything has been on hold including the visa bulletin release schedules.
Yesterday, we described potential four options for the DOS and the USCIS. Unconfirmed sources indicate that the last option appears to be "out." Obviously there are still under a tremendous pressure to work out a solution before the three-day deadline of the Congresswoman's investigatory demand. It is going to be a very tense and stressful weekend for these officials. For that matter, the immigrants may also go through a similar process emotionally during the weekend, not knowing when and what information will be released during the weekend or Monday. Eyes of the many immigrants will be glued to the computer monitors. May God Help the Poor Souls! Amen.
hairstyles Yes, Brooke Shields can still
ScratchingHead
10-01 01:07 PM
It takes one week to get the visa stamped. I did it and went to India in August. They will schedule FP for you in a location close to you.
Shame on you....travel thru countries that don't steal your money in the form of 'transit visa'.
Shame on you....travel thru countries that don't steal your money in the form of 'transit visa'.
485Mbe4001
06-13 05:35 PM
Can a spouse of a person on Eb3 apply for EB2(if eligible) and then port his/her application with the EB3 PD for the family?
waitforgc1
02-10 01:34 PM
The main difference is maintaining the similar job profile until you get GC while switching jobs.
No comments:
Post a Comment