mbartosik
02-13 10:33 PM
as I said worth a try, but may not fly.
It probably depends on individual SS officer, ask politely, and there may be a chance. If it was down to the customer service agent that I spoke to he would have allowed it, but that's not his job.
My plan is to file for extensions until my wife gets SS via GC, which will likely be within months for us not years.
It probably depends on individual SS officer, ask politely, and there may be a chance. If it was down to the customer service agent that I spoke to he would have allowed it, but that's not his job.
My plan is to file for extensions until my wife gets SS via GC, which will likely be within months for us not years.
wallpaper Alcohol T-Shirt Funny
kondur_007
09-21 11:39 AM
I doubt that USCIS gave us any additional information beyon what you would see on their website by tomorrow anyway!
So hang tight for one more day and you will see it all on their website.
By the way, I do personally believe that it would be only fair to include all the FOIA donors in the information sharing by IV, but it's just a personal opinion. Different people may have different views on it.
Just chill....
So hang tight for one more day and you will see it all on their website.
By the way, I do personally believe that it would be only fair to include all the FOIA donors in the information sharing by IV, but it's just a personal opinion. Different people may have different views on it.
Just chill....
puvathoor
07-10 11:39 AM
Hello,
I am still waiting to hear about my LC case PD 11/2003 Regular MI and wanted to know what kind of scenario awaits me in the future. When is the earlier that I can apply for my wife's work permit and is there any way to get her H1 done independent of my pending LC?
Also, has anyone with similar PD (regular) seen any progress with their case?
Thank you.
DDL
A few more steps are required before your wife can work..
Your wife can work after you apply for adjustment of status / EAD document.. which you can after your I-485 application has been with USCIS for 6 months..
Of course you have not filed for I-485 as yet..
Because for this you need an approved I-140 (2-3 months or lesser after LC ) and of course the LC..
Regards,
----
I am still waiting to hear about my LC case PD 11/2003 Regular MI and wanted to know what kind of scenario awaits me in the future. When is the earlier that I can apply for my wife's work permit and is there any way to get her H1 done independent of my pending LC?
Also, has anyone with similar PD (regular) seen any progress with their case?
Thank you.
DDL
A few more steps are required before your wife can work..
Your wife can work after you apply for adjustment of status / EAD document.. which you can after your I-485 application has been with USCIS for 6 months..
Of course you have not filed for I-485 as yet..
Because for this you need an approved I-140 (2-3 months or lesser after LC ) and of course the LC..
Regards,
----
2011 Funny
kumar1
09-09 11:22 AM
Came to USA in Jan 2001 (L1)
Job loss in APR-2001 (Economy going South)
Joined new company in May-2001 on H1
Filed First Labor in 2003 (RIR)
Second Job loss in 2004
Joined 3rd company in APR promised that GC is no issue, showed me finger after I asked for it.
Joined 4th company in FEB-2005 ("DESI ki jai ho", started GC process on day1)
Re Filed under PERM (July 2005 under EB-3 India)
Did Canadian PR between 2004-2006
Got Canadian PR in 2006
Filed 485 in July 2007
Waiting.......................
Initiated EB-2 process in Sep-2008.
Things that I realized during last 8 year --
1. GC only hurts me when I think about it.
2. Every time I lost/changed my job, I managed to get salary hike and better work.
Job loss in APR-2001 (Economy going South)
Joined new company in May-2001 on H1
Filed First Labor in 2003 (RIR)
Second Job loss in 2004
Joined 3rd company in APR promised that GC is no issue, showed me finger after I asked for it.
Joined 4th company in FEB-2005 ("DESI ki jai ho", started GC process on day1)
Re Filed under PERM (July 2005 under EB-3 India)
Did Canadian PR between 2004-2006
Got Canadian PR in 2006
Filed 485 in July 2007
Waiting.......................
Initiated EB-2 process in Sep-2008.
Things that I realized during last 8 year --
1. GC only hurts me when I think about it.
2. Every time I lost/changed my job, I managed to get salary hike and better work.
more...
yestogc
07-02 09:48 PM
These people have time to type 51 pages of confusing memo, but cannot draft it in simple terms or use time more wisely.
Almost all of us know and follow ...................... either we renew our H1B after 6 years or we switch on EAD, but this memo does not talk about a situation wherein one is in AOS stage and using EAD.
These guys are just too much.
Almost all of us know and follow ...................... either we renew our H1B after 6 years or we switch on EAD, but this memo does not talk about a situation wherein one is in AOS stage and using EAD.
These guys are just too much.
mpadapa
07-30 05:04 PM
Here is the schedule
http://judiciary.house.gov/hearings/calendar.html
Subcommittee on Immigration, Citizenship, Refugees, Border Security, and International Law
2:30 P.M. in 2141 Rayburn House Office Building
Meeting to request: Department of Homeland Security Departmental Report on the Beneficiary of: H.R. 3092, a Private Bill for the relief of Kimerly Ruth; and
Sucommittee Markup of: H.R. 6020, to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to protect the well-being of soldiers and their famlies, and for other purposes;
H.R. 5882, to recapture employment-based immigrant visas lost to bureaucratic delays and to prevent losse of family- and employment-based immigrant visas in the future; and
H.R. 5924, the "Emergency Nursing Supply Relief Act";
Am I missing something. I went to the link below and I don,t find the bill H.R 5882 in the list of bills for Mark-up. Do i have to look at some other place?
http://judiciary.house.gov/hearings/legislation.html
Thanks
http://judiciary.house.gov/hearings/calendar.html
Subcommittee on Immigration, Citizenship, Refugees, Border Security, and International Law
2:30 P.M. in 2141 Rayburn House Office Building
Meeting to request: Department of Homeland Security Departmental Report on the Beneficiary of: H.R. 3092, a Private Bill for the relief of Kimerly Ruth; and
Sucommittee Markup of: H.R. 6020, to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to protect the well-being of soldiers and their famlies, and for other purposes;
H.R. 5882, to recapture employment-based immigrant visas lost to bureaucratic delays and to prevent losse of family- and employment-based immigrant visas in the future; and
H.R. 5924, the "Emergency Nursing Supply Relief Act";
Am I missing something. I went to the link below and I don,t find the bill H.R 5882 in the list of bills for Mark-up. Do i have to look at some other place?
http://judiciary.house.gov/hearings/legislation.html
Thanks
more...
Canadian_Dream
05-23 09:19 PM
I never said a law cannot be enacted treating people in the system retroactively. What I am saying here, the government agency implementing such a law will have to go through a night mere.
First of all, there's nothing that prevents a law of acting retroactively(not even the case here) or (as in this case) set a past cut-off date. If you don't agree, tell me, where in the constitution does it say that?
You've heard of freedom of speech, freedom to carry firearms, etc. Have you ever heard of Protection-Against-A**hatted-Retroactive-Laws?!
It doesn't matter how outrageous or unfair you find it, congress has the power to enact such a law. Green-card is priviledge, not a right (I'm only speaking in legal terms here, not in moral terms, so don't take it personally).
It's just a hastily written bill that's devastating for a small subsection of of us who haven't filed I-140 yet. A small casualty when laws affecting 12-20 millions are being made.
First of all, there's nothing that prevents a law of acting retroactively(not even the case here) or (as in this case) set a past cut-off date. If you don't agree, tell me, where in the constitution does it say that?
You've heard of freedom of speech, freedom to carry firearms, etc. Have you ever heard of Protection-Against-A**hatted-Retroactive-Laws?!
It doesn't matter how outrageous or unfair you find it, congress has the power to enact such a law. Green-card is priviledge, not a right (I'm only speaking in legal terms here, not in moral terms, so don't take it personally).
It's just a hastily written bill that's devastating for a small subsection of of us who haven't filed I-140 yet. A small casualty when laws affecting 12-20 millions are being made.
2010 Scissors Beats Paper Shirt
rahulpaper
09-05 10:45 PM
Came to US Aug 1998.
First Labor Jan2003
Second Labor Jan 2005
PERM OCT 2006...=>PD.
Got laid off from one job and other I quit myself. Some people argue that I am waiting for only last 2 years since PD is Oct 2006.
July 07 Filer...Thanks to IV otherwise my 485 would still be not in.
I do have 4yr Bachelor from India and MS from US and currently pursuing EMBA (ivy league)...so life never stops in US... I only hope USCIS could do a better job on maintaining proper FIFO based on PD.
First Labor Jan2003
Second Labor Jan 2005
PERM OCT 2006...=>PD.
Got laid off from one job and other I quit myself. Some people argue that I am waiting for only last 2 years since PD is Oct 2006.
July 07 Filer...Thanks to IV otherwise my 485 would still be not in.
I do have 4yr Bachelor from India and MS from US and currently pursuing EMBA (ivy league)...so life never stops in US... I only hope USCIS could do a better job on maintaining proper FIFO based on PD.
more...
msp1976
01-23 03:47 PM
I was under the impression that this organization and its resources are to be used for a 'rational' purpose of finding out ways to stay in this country and not the other way around...
Please close this thread....
Please close this thread....
hair Doggy Style Stickmen funny
qplearn
09-21 11:25 AM
Please don't pour water on the efforts done by the core team and active IV members. There were very hectic activities that went on yesterday on the Capitol hill. There were IV core team members physically present in D.C. We are hopefull something would be done. As everybody's aware this is a very difficult time because of the elections but even in this difficult scenario we successfully got our provisions pass thru the Senate. It wasn't enough as we have to get our provisions thru both the houses. It is extremely difficult situation but it is not impossible, so we have to keep pushing and be assertive, but at the same time we have to pay QGA their monthly fees so we need money to get going....
I don't think there is anything wrong in asking for money, but it did not have to be done on the thread that was clearly going to raise hopes and catch attention. Especially as the core team IV likes to keep things "close to its chest," (this came from a member) I don't see why there was any need to post that thread yesterday.
I don't think there is anything wrong in asking for money, but it did not have to be done on the thread that was clearly going to raise hopes and catch attention. Especially as the core team IV likes to keep things "close to its chest," (this came from a member) I don't see why there was any need to post that thread yesterday.
more...
sanju_dba
07-27 11:11 AM
I was NOT asked to show ATV anytime during my travel, both ways. I only showed my AP while coming back to USA at both HYD and FRA. I didn't have to show AP for my travel from US to India.
What was your backup plan if they insisted on ATV?
What was your backup plan if they insisted on ATV?
hot Don#39;t bogart that shirt,
sanju_dba
09-01 07:19 PM
spicy guy, which service center did you apply? if its texas, you are cool, u should get ur AP within 15-30 days max. I have travel in the third week of november and I applied for renewal in Nebraska and my RD for this is August 6th. I am not very optimistic. Cos, per the website, its taking anywhere between 95-150 days these days for AP renewal in NE.
56days so far at TSC !
56days so far at TSC !
more...
house Funny t shirts, funny shirts,
go_guy123
02-24 08:33 AM
Dude
Get your facts straight
Univ of Houston IS NOT a low rank school.
NOR DO THEY ACCEPT 3 YR DEGREES
Please dont give out false info.
In fact some univs allow remedial courses before u join Masters program.
Get your facts straight
Univ of Houston IS NOT a low rank school.
NOR DO THEY ACCEPT 3 YR DEGREES
Please dont give out false info.
In fact some univs allow remedial courses before u join Masters program.
tattoo Feb 28. Ughhh
sagar_nyc
04-02 11:37 AM
I am on Advance Parole . Entered at Newark airport last week. first io checked all passport, AP for my wife and I, then asked me how long i was there outside country. i said three weeks. then took me to another room and gave my file to another IO . Another io stamped on my AP, passport and let us go. it went pretty smooth except bit long wait around 45 mins in the room. but it is worth it as i don't have to go thru hassle of getting visa stamped in India.
All,
There are number of rumors criculating related to denials at port of entry. I thought it will be very helpful if we can have this thread to post SELF/OWN experiences with H1B / Advance Parole at Port of Entry. This way we can get an idea on the reality.
Port of Entry:
Visa Type: H1B / Advance Parole
How did it go at Port of Entry:
Please restrict to post your OWN experience to avoid word to mouth translation of romours.
Thanks
Bob
All,
There are number of rumors criculating related to denials at port of entry. I thought it will be very helpful if we can have this thread to post SELF/OWN experiences with H1B / Advance Parole at Port of Entry. This way we can get an idea on the reality.
Port of Entry:
Visa Type: H1B / Advance Parole
How did it go at Port of Entry:
Please restrict to post your OWN experience to avoid word to mouth translation of romours.
Thanks
Bob
more...
pictures Cat Riding T-Shirt
NYC-circuit
11-13 09:58 AM
When did ur application reached USCIS. I am july 2nd filer. They told me same story 1 month back they going to finish by Oct 30th and agaon told me on Nov 5th. Now they are telling Nov 20th.
I lost the trust on them.
The application package reached on July 27th, will be calling them in a few will post what they are saying now
I lost the trust on them.
The application package reached on July 27th, will be calling them in a few will post what they are saying now
dresses Funny Shirts
gcdedo
04-11 08:36 PM
PD - 16th Dec 2004
Type -EB3 RIR
State -IL
Dallas BEC
45 Day Letter - April 11,2006
Type -EB3 RIR
State -IL
Dallas BEC
45 Day Letter - April 11,2006
more...
makeup Funny Shirt
pappu
01-07 08:37 AM
I have asked for access to donor forum several times and I have finally given up!
Please contact IV with your subscription details. As per our records there is no subscription information.
Please contact IV with your subscription details. As per our records there is no subscription information.
girlfriend Russian T-shirts, CCCP Shirts
GIC
09-20 04:27 PM
Thumbs up for IV's effort. Contributed for this month. Will contribute again next month.
hairstyles sperm shirt shirts tshirt
mrajatish
03-20 03:00 PM
My understanding is that in EB immigration, excess visas from each category will now be priority date based. Did we talk to any lawyers yet?
coolfun
07-09 10:28 PM
Have a look at this:
http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=f4b3076eb0f93110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCR D&vgnextchannel=1958b0aaa86fa010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1 RCRD
http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=f4b3076eb0f93110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCR D&vgnextchannel=1958b0aaa86fa010VgnVCM10000045f3d6a1 RCRD
ashkam
07-10 10:24 AM
Guys,
I have sent the details about Example 2 on Page 10 of the memo to attorney Matthew from OH Law Firm to seek his opinion. I had asked him to post it on his website for the benefit of employment based immigrant community. I am posting the response from his website. You can also read this response on his website, immigration-law.com.
As you can see in the last sentence, he clearly says there is no need to panick because this has been the law all along and has not been interpreted correctly by immigrants.
07/09/2009: "Unlawful Status" for I-485 Applicant Failing to Maintain Nonimmigrant Status in the USCIS Consolidated Memorandum on "Unlawful Presence" Pushes Immigrants to Confusion and Edge
* Some employment-based immigrants have read "out of the context" the part of the USCIS recently released consolidated memorandum on unlawful presence that defines I-485 waiters not maintaining a nonimmigrant status as "unlawful status" and who are subject to removal proceeding, pushing themselves into confusion and fears. In fact, this part of the consolidated memorandum is nothing new in that all along it has been the law that the I-485 applicants who fail to maintain a nonimmigrant status and stay and work on EAD are not nonimmigrants and "not in status." Since an alien in "not in status" (unlawful status) can be subject to removal proceedings, there is nothing wrong with that part of the consolidated memorandum. However, these readers missed another part of the consolidated memorandum that states that because of prosecutorial discretion and related rules, such I-485 applicants are considered "in authorized to stay" (lawful stay). The language "in authorized to stay" not only means that the unlawful presence that triggers bar to admission is "tolled" but also means that such aliens will not be prosecuted for the unlawful status inasmuch as they are in a valid I-485 proceeding. Flip side of the coin of this law is that since such alien is not "in status," once I-485 application is denied, they lose the basis of the "in authorized to stay," and the government can initiate the removal proceedings unless the aliens depart from the country voluntarily. For the reasons, some I-485 applicants have strived to maintain a H or L visa status adamantly against the potential denial of I-485 applications, but it is completely different issue from current misunderstanding within the employment-based immigrant community that the government can start removal proceedings simply because their status is unlawful and they can be subjected to a forced removal from the country simply because they decided not to extend their nonimmigrant status pending I-485 applications. People should stop panicking on this issue.
Thanks for the update.
I have sent the details about Example 2 on Page 10 of the memo to attorney Matthew from OH Law Firm to seek his opinion. I had asked him to post it on his website for the benefit of employment based immigrant community. I am posting the response from his website. You can also read this response on his website, immigration-law.com.
As you can see in the last sentence, he clearly says there is no need to panick because this has been the law all along and has not been interpreted correctly by immigrants.
07/09/2009: "Unlawful Status" for I-485 Applicant Failing to Maintain Nonimmigrant Status in the USCIS Consolidated Memorandum on "Unlawful Presence" Pushes Immigrants to Confusion and Edge
* Some employment-based immigrants have read "out of the context" the part of the USCIS recently released consolidated memorandum on unlawful presence that defines I-485 waiters not maintaining a nonimmigrant status as "unlawful status" and who are subject to removal proceeding, pushing themselves into confusion and fears. In fact, this part of the consolidated memorandum is nothing new in that all along it has been the law that the I-485 applicants who fail to maintain a nonimmigrant status and stay and work on EAD are not nonimmigrants and "not in status." Since an alien in "not in status" (unlawful status) can be subject to removal proceedings, there is nothing wrong with that part of the consolidated memorandum. However, these readers missed another part of the consolidated memorandum that states that because of prosecutorial discretion and related rules, such I-485 applicants are considered "in authorized to stay" (lawful stay). The language "in authorized to stay" not only means that the unlawful presence that triggers bar to admission is "tolled" but also means that such aliens will not be prosecuted for the unlawful status inasmuch as they are in a valid I-485 proceeding. Flip side of the coin of this law is that since such alien is not "in status," once I-485 application is denied, they lose the basis of the "in authorized to stay," and the government can initiate the removal proceedings unless the aliens depart from the country voluntarily. For the reasons, some I-485 applicants have strived to maintain a H or L visa status adamantly against the potential denial of I-485 applications, but it is completely different issue from current misunderstanding within the employment-based immigrant community that the government can start removal proceedings simply because their status is unlawful and they can be subjected to a forced removal from the country simply because they decided not to extend their nonimmigrant status pending I-485 applications. People should stop panicking on this issue.
Thanks for the update.
No comments:
Post a Comment